I applaud the New York Times for caring to write about type 1 technology. I would encourage them to take a little more time to better understand the subject next time. I'll try to help. Since we are all Americans here, lets use a metaphor we all understand - cars. Fuel efficient small foreign cars, so maybe not something we all understand.
In the 1970s I drove a VW Beatle. It had been my mom’s. It would go anywhere, including places my friend Ric broke his jeep. One year for Christmas I got a hand full of Craftsman tools and rebuilt the engine and clutch. Bugs were easy enough to fix anyone with tools could do it.
Coming home from college one weekend, I was cut off on a highway and skidded into a gas station sign. The car was totaled. I was nearly so too. The impact of my face cracked the steering wheel and popped the windshield out. The Glass flew across the service station and landed unbroken. I remember the gas station guys talking about seeing the glass fly and marveling that it didn’t break, from my semi conscious state waiting for the ambulance.
I still like small cars. I have a Mini. It has a host of features my Bug lacked; anti lock breaks, a host of front and side air bags, crumple zone construction, good seat belts, power steering and much more.
I bring all this up to point out the value of current automotive technology verses 1970s technology. It would be easy to say that both the Beatle and the Mini do the same job. They get me from point A to point B in relatively the same mix of shifting, steering, breaking and being a little weary of bigger vehicles. In that context the newer car’s significantly higher cost could be seen an extravagance.
Modern cars are significantly safer (even if they don’t go up Jeep trails like a Bug.)
I think there is a parallel to diabetes technology. Modern diabetes technology looks like it is doing the same job as the 70s stuff.
Modern insulins allow a better if not perfect parallel of physiologic insulin. Pumps provide a better delivery system and allow delivery to be programed to daily rhythms. Continuous sensing can alert patients to changes and prevent dangerous lows and highs.
Yes, this stuff cost more than 1970’s stuff. Cost isn’t the question, value is. Air bags are mandated because some cars are gonna crash. Antilock breaks, crumple zone construction, side impact doors, safe fuel systems etc all cost more. The value is in safer roads, lives saved.
See where I am goin’ here?
The story of technology is the value it brings. Computers cost more than pencils, ruled notebooks and movable type presses. The New York Times assembles the paper with computers, because they bring value. We drive safer cars for the value. People with type 1 diabetes can be more productive members of society due to the value of effective technology.
Sent via email to: Elisabeth Rosenthal NYT. (without the cool images, what can ya do.)
ps. Neither my Bug of Mini looked the good but the colors are right.